Posted by
DBowes on Wednesday, October 29, 2008 12:58:47 PM
Back in the seventies, a young lawyer from Tennessee, who was assisting Sen Howard Baker on the Watergate senate investigation, asked: "What did the wanna-be president know, and when did he know it?" That young attorney later became a senator himself and a presidential candidate in this last Republican primary election. Fred Thompson's question is apropos today for the latest scandal to break in Team Obama. It now appears that the Obama campaign has turned off its fraud prevention mechanism on accepting credit card donations via the internet. This means that there is no way that they, or any of us for that matter, would know who was contributing what and how much. This is a clear violation of federal campaign contribution laws and is beyond egregious. See this key graph from a recent article in the Washington Post just yesterday:
"Sen. Barack Obama's presidential campaign is allowing donors to use largely untraceable prepaid credit cards that could potentially be used to evade limits on how much an individual is legally allowed to give or to mask a contributor's identity, campaign officials confirmed. Faced with a huge influx of donations over the Internet, the campaign has also chosen not to use basic security measures to prevent potentially illegal or anonymous contributions from flowing into its accounts, aides acknowledged. Instead, the campaign is scrutinizing its books for improper donations after the money has been deposited. The Obama organization said its extensive review has ensured that the campaign has refunded any improper contributions, and noted that Federal Election Commission rules do not require front-end screening of donations. In recent weeks, questionable contributions have created headaches for Obama's accounting team as it has tried to explain why campaign finance filings have included itemized donations from individuals using fake names, such as Es Esh or Doodad Pro. Those revelations prompted conservative bloggers to further test Obama's finance vetting by giving money using the kind of prepaid cards that can be bought at a drugstore and cannot be traced to a donor. The problem with such cards, campaign finance lawyers said, is that they make it impossible to tell whether foreign nationals, donors who have exceeded the limits, government contractors or others who are barred from giving to a federal campaign are making contributions. "They have opened the floodgates to all this money coming in," said Sean Cairncross, chief counsel to the Republican National Committee. "I think they've made the determination that whatever money they have to refund on the back end doesn't outweigh the benefit of taking all this money upfront." The Obama campaign has shattered presidential fundraising records, in part by capitalizing on the ease of online giving. Of the $150 million the senator from Illinois raised in September, nearly $100 million came in over the Internet ....Page AO2, Washington Post, Tuesday, October 28, 2008
(Hat tip to Beldar via Hugh Hewitt blog)
Who is giving millions to the Obama campaign? Why is the candidate himself not outraged at what his staff has done. Why has no one been fired and a full investigation launched? If Obama is elected because the MSM fails to alert the public of this "flesh eating bacteria" (thank you, Beldar), he will be unable to govern with such a scandal hanging over his head, thereby opening our country up to attack from our enemies. Wake up, everybody! This is bad stuff!
Look! Obama is a charming individual and a great orator. He has a lovely smile and can hit a three from 24 feet; however, do not lose sight that he is a shifty Chicago pol with close ties to very disreputable individuals. What, I ask you, was he doing at a gala in 2003 praising and honoring Rashid Khlidi, a known mouthpiece for the PLO. Why did he not walk out of that gala when an anti-Israel poem was read, a poem that was anti-zionist and advocated violence against Israel. Well, Khalidi was his friend. He and his wife baby-sat the Obama children and had dinner together on a number of occasions. IT WASN'T JUST SOMEONE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD, MR. ROGERS!!! Also, for your information, William Ayers was also at that gala to honor Khalidi. The LA Times ran a story on this in the spring and is in possession of a tape that shows all this. The Times is refusing to release the tape. The McCain campaign has demanded that this tape be released to the public, but the Times is stating that the story they ran is sufficient. For greater detail see
this.